🔗 Share this article

Mainstream parties in power are increasingly enabling the far right to set the public discourse, as per a new research carried out in the Federal Republic of Germany.

Researchers found that this phenomenon has unwittingly benefited radical groups by validating their viewpoints and disseminating them to a broader audience.

Study Drawing from Over 20 Years of News Coverage

The results, released in the academic journal on political studies, utilized an automated text analysis of over 520,000 articles from six German newspapers.

Berlin-based scholars noted that as the radical faction moved from marginal topics in the 1990s era to core subjects like assimilation and immigration, mainstream political groups increasingly adapted their communication in response.

This adjustment amplified the dissemination of these ideas and indicated to voters that such stances were legitimate.

Consequences for Democracy

"Public communication by mainstream parties plays a central role in the electoral success of the radical right," explained a political sociologist involved in the study.

"This element has been overlooked," she added.

The effect was noticeable even when mainstream parties were criticising the radical faction. "They still receive focus," the expert remarked. "Our core argument is that because we live in such a struggle for visibility, this focus is key."

Normalisation Effect Throughout Europe

While the research was focused on Germany, this normalisation effect is likely to affect nations across Europe.

"You see this a lot in German and British news outlets," said another researcher. "Radical groups says something and everyone starts talking about it for several days."

"Although you're countering it, you're repeating it," he added.

Toughening of Public Rhetoric

At certain points, political figures have also hardened their language to match that of the far right.

In a recent discussion, a then German chancellor called for widespread deportations and pushed for them to happen "more often and faster."

Similar examples can be observed throughout Europe, as elected officials from nations including the United Kingdom to the French Republic adopt the language of the radical right, especially on immigration.

This has created an feedback loop that would have been unthinkable a ten years prior.

Central Issue: Who Sets the Agenda?

"{If you're a centrist political group and you are talking about societal topics – immigration, assimilation – in a way that is dictated by the rhythm of the radical right, that's the whole idea of agenda setting," clarified a researcher.

Other parties have gone one step further, attempting to emulate the hardline platform of the far right, despite studies indicates that doing so leads voters to vote for the far right.

Gradual Impact and Voter Awareness

The scope of data gathered showed that the impact of far-right parties had been progressive and had grown over time.

"Public perception doesn't change from day to day," commented a co-author. "But if you hear this negative framing around immigration every second week, and it is being spread not only by far-right parties but also, for instance, by established political organizations, then of course this storyline gains more traction."

Requirement for Mainstream Parties to Develop Their Own Narratives

The research highlighted the necessity for mainstream parties to carve out their own discourses, especially on topics such as immigration and assimilation, rather than continuously following the radical right.

"It resembles a choreography," explained one researcher. "When the leader is radical and you're reacting to it, you lose the ability to choose which music should be heard."